The Challenges for the Success of Mark Carney’s Government at Home

There has recently been a good deal of favourable press on the achievements of Mark Carney, especially internationally. The contrast with the American experience is dramatic and Carney’s ability to negotiate with more authoritarian leaders abroad has put Canada on the map. So, he comes across well as a savvy international economist and negotiator, but has been criticized in the media for a number of shortcomings at home.

Further, Carney has promised to substantially increase the budget for defence to 5% of GDP. To pay for this, his government is now proposing cuts to the public service (30,000 positions – to find $60-B in internal ‘savings’ – 16,000 positions have been identified to date). Few details are available on what these reductions could mean for specific programs or services. But two departments responsible for Indigenous issues, plus National Defence, Public Safety, Women and Gender Equality, and federal research granting councils have been identified for their “essential nature” and therefore cushioned from such drastic action.

[See attached pdf of article from the Globe and Mail – no URL because it’s behind a paywall]

The Parliamentary Budget Officer has released a report that said the departments are not providing information about the impact of cuts on services to Canadians.

https://www.pbo-dpb.ca/en/additional-analyses–analyses-complementaires/BLOG-2526-014--pbo-information-requests-regarding-planned-reductions-under-2025-comprehensive-expenditure-review-fo–demandes-information-dpb-concernant-reductions-prevues-dans-cadre-examen-exhaustif-depenses-2025-sui#antn_3

Canadians have traditionally taken many services for granted as part of the public system, such as the food inspection agency:

https://www.nationalobserver.com/2026/01/28/news/cfia-job-cuts-food-safety-concerns

and the agricultural research station network:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/lacombe-agriculture-research-centre-closure-9.7065873

https://www.nfu.ca/cuts-to-aafc-are-disastrous-for-canada-says-national-farmers-union

https://www.seedworld.com/canada/2026/01/29/what-we-know-so-far-about-the-reported-cuts-to-aafc-staffing-research-stations/

to state only two examples. In addition, environmentally aware Canadians are concerned about the lack of attention to climate change in recent federal government policies.

https://mailchi.mp/reclimate/the-view-from-here-13881204

Questions:

1. What is your opinion of the perceived success of the Carney government affected by the domestic policy decisions and proposed cuts in funding?

2. In view of the enthusiastic endorsement of Pierre Poilievre as the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, what is the likelihood of a Conservative win if an election is called this year?

3. Where do you see spending on the public service to be excessive? How do you see such choices aligning with humanists’ view that science based decision making is essential?

4. Which public service could you do without?

See you there!  Bring somebody.
* Donations gratefully accepted.
www.vsha.ca